Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
-
Content count
4943 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Admin
-
-
Hy buddy...!!!
It would be preferable to connect the antenna to the reflector with wire
1 person likes this -
-
,,,adlan,why don't you say anything, how does the antenna work?
-
I think you don't need to connect directly the antenna to the phone anymore, you can have your phone connected to the access point.
,,,or if you want watch this video on youtube....
1 person likes this -
,,,hi buddy,know that I missed you...!!!
I'll try to model something like this for the desired frequency...!!!,,,but tell me, which model of bowtie antenna is it for...???
-
,,okay,but there is still something wrong with the H1 and H3 dimensions....!!!
1 person likes this -
In this POST, we investigate a wideband magnetoelectric dipole antennA miniaturized by folding. In the proposed design, a folded L‐shaped electric dipole
is used instead of the conventional half‐wavelength horizontal electric dipole, and a pair of vertically folded shorted patches act as a magnetic dipole, producing a
miniaturized radiator. Furthermore, a small‐size U‐shaped reflector replaces the traditional large‐size planar reflector, resulting in a decrease in the low end of the
frequency band, while the high end of the frequency band remains almost unchanged. A better impedance matching is also obtained over the entire operating
frequency band. Ultimately, a miniaturized overall structure and a wide bandwidthare obtained simultaneously. The overall size of the proposed antenna is only
0.25λ×0.25λ×0.12λLLL(whereλL is the longest operating wavelength),
which is 82% smaller than the size of the original design, but the proposed antenna can still obtain a large bandwidth of 120% (1–4GHz) for VSWR<2.
Furthermore,stable radiation patterns are realized with an average gain of 5 dBi within theoperating frequency band
Our friend Clanon previously posted the following...
"the Feed strips don't make contact , the energy is induced by proximity probe"
1 person likes this -
-
Can this be true...???
1 person likes this -
-
AndreyKot,
...the Cantennator program is not very good, so please view these forum posts...
I will try to make an optimal simulation for this frequency(800 MHz).
1 person likes this -
-
-
-
-
-
-
,,,not yet, but in the future...!!!
-
okay, I'll try.
1 person likes this -
So you mean to increase the number of directors.../??
-
For documentation, I think this should be studied...
matecconf_icesti2018_01042.pdf
,,,dual element triangle patch microstrip antenna for WLAN 2.4 GHz....!!!!
1 person likes this -
-
Your file is completely wrong...!!!
-
Okay, now post the images with the results obtained...!!!
in Modeling antennas
Posted
The central contact is not short, it is 5.77 mm.
I will do a simulation with this connector.
SMA Jack.cst