Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Today
-
,,,for those who want to optimize this antenna... Magnita.cst
- Yesterday
- Last week
-
RoundPatch.cst
-
An antenna with dual polarized, dual ports design, unexpected good results!!! RoundPatch.cst
-
,,,yes,it could be covered with a plastic... ,,,sorry for the mistake, D1=70 mm
-
Excellent ... now if I'm going to try JJJJ ... only the measures of the patches are missing on the edge of the reflector. Could it be covered with a specific plastic or can it be anyone? A question ... The square bester D1 would be 99 or 69?
-
D1=99 mm ,,,and because I saw that you like square patches...
-
Sorry, but the D1 measurements were missing.
-
Does it have two connectors...? Reactivity is high and Z should stay closer to 50 ohms... to be ideal...
-
It's pretty simple, you just post there what's here.
-
Hi, don't find a way to do this, please tell me and I'll move it
-
,,,,papagayor....I think your post should be here... Can you move it there...???
-
May the double port cause the lower dbi gain or the whole parts placement, also I did not add a component in this, it's a testing project and someone that knows more than me could modify it
-
You need something like this....
-
Here is the biquad, with what I'm connecting to you right now. The design is based of the model from martybugs.net website. The refletor dimension is about 154mm*143mm, I did it according to what I have. Everything is still experimental, luckily working but unfortunately with a fairly poor result.
-
Yes.. it looks good, I could try... give me more construction details
-
Trevor approach seems the Right on the money! BUT it's using an OFFSET DISH...No SHADOW from feed and different focus F/D ratio spillage etc,
-
,,yes,6---8 mm...!!!! ,,,but I think a panel antenna would be better...!!!
-
is goin to be a BIG secondary reflector and Biquads have an almost spherical lobe IIRC (better suited for a DISH )
-
Thanks friend... I just can't stand making more circles anymore... it's easier and much better to test this way. Can you use a central support wider than 6 mm?
-
,,,rana75,show what biquad you have...!!
-
Trevor Marshall suggested two sidelips (up and down) of 20mm, and Andrew McNeil suggested a 30mm one,which one is better?
-
Clanon, the boy has a biquad antenna...!!!
-
Secondary Reflector (small one with similar angle and shape as MAIN reflector) is of MOST IMPORTANCE and antenna should be BACKFIRING (looking back) otherwise you're JUST shielding it from back signals...
-
The original "claimed" 11 dbi gain...SMC patch
-
,,,try varying the distance of 355 mm for optimal reception...
- Load more activity
