Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

clanon
Members-
Content count
801 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Trevor approach seems the Right on the money! BUT it's using an OFFSET DISH...No SHADOW from feed and different focus F/D ratio spillage etc,
-
is goin to be a BIG secondary reflector and Biquads have an almost spherical lobe IIRC (better suited for a DISH )
-
Secondary Reflector (small one with similar angle and shape as MAIN reflector) is of MOST IMPORTANCE and antenna should be BACKFIRING (looking back) otherwise you're JUST shielding it from back signals...
-
The original "claimed" 11 dbi gain...SMC patch
-
Radome seems THICK 2mm PC (Polycarbonate) Those big BOLTS must have some effect too...
-
Phase and Impedance matching( Radiator Z + Feed point z) Yes ALL ANTENNAS are the same ; any conductive material) Dielectric must be CONSIDERED (different ε (epsilon), and Tangent Loss) A HALF WAVE radiator could be held at center point cause there is a Low impedance (high Current) point no EFFECT on general characteristics...(the WAVE is NOT MOVING at THAT specific POINT)
-
we SHOULD make a DATABASE and keep it in the cloud with our CSTs and 3D or DXF files , for the interested in trying them...
- 1 reply
-
1
-
- antennas testing
- CST
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
not sure manual CALL'em ANT1 ANT2 ANT3 ANT4
-
-
TAMP125 NO IDEA...but nestiam might open the box and SHOW US... the receiver has a lot of netbook antennas inside (no good)
-
-
Ant 1 and 2 are for frequencies from 600 700 and 960 Mhz also Ant3 and 4 are for frequencies ABOVE 1710Mhz Check YOUR frequencies of interest
-
What efficiency...? better or worse than FR4 ...did you input the Tangent loss...
-
What DIELECTRIC...?
-
different video same antenna