Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Today
-
I will update this.. Thank
-
No no of course it would be very kind to receive the CST-file of your antenna from you.
-
,,,then you don't want my type of antenna patch anymore...??
-
a little bit strange but the environmental conditions for these Antennas a quite challenging
-
,,,,aaaaaa, that's what you want..???
-
sorry just an open front and as robust as the following antenna:
-
,,,4 sides,not 5 sides...???
-
Reflector bent upwards on 4 sides to mechanically protect the inside of the antenna. I need a mechanically very robust antenna.
-
,,,what do you understand "surrounded by steel on 5 sides"...????
-
sounds good..!! By the way, I am looking for a mechanically small and robust (panel ?) antenna (868MHz) with approx. 10 dBi gain, surrounded by steel on 5 sides. Do you have any suggestions?
-
,,,maybe only with more directors...!!!
-
Hi This would be fine. Can you even adjust it for more gain?
-
,,,hi buddy...!!! I don't think I have this file anymore, but I will resume the simulation, if you want...!!!
-
Hi Would it be possible to get a CST-file of this antenna. Thanks
- Yesterday
-
,,,can someone be interested in something like this///...???
- Today
-
Hi, Can someone help, i am trying to match antenna but it's doesn't work. Thank you Sebastien_G_v2.aedtz M830320_08232022_19r3.zip Zest_Core_nRF5340-CLAA-v1.0.0.pdf
- Yesterday
-
,,, the antenna is not well designed, it needs a stub...
-
Hi everyone! I work on printed log periodic antenna in 300...400 MHz band and I found out that the theoretical expressions do not give a good result and antenna still needs an optimization. While optimizing I faced to a problem, that the CST optimizer changes all parameters in the same time so the structure is changed dramatically. Give me please an advise how to run the optimization of the antenna structure while saving arm's dimensions ratio. Here is the .cst file Thank you in advance Log Periodic.cst
-
Found the axial ratio here
- Last week
-
Can it be wound from wire instead stripe ? What dimensions for 2.4Ghz ?
-
-
,,,these would be the results... to see the axial ratio in CST, you should look at "Farfields" section in the simulated results... there should be a drop down list after simulating the design. if you click on that drop down list you should be able to see the axial ratio plot... The default plot is in 3D format, if you want to plot it on polar form, you need to right click on a farfield result and select "Far field plot properties", In the "General" tab select "polar" for the "plot type" and choose the values for "Theta" & "Phi" according to the orientation of your design. Then select "apply" to see the results
-
Hi Admin!! I have the 2023 version. Yeah, sure. Here is my .cst file of my V-inverted dipole Dipole 351 antenna ver 3.cst
-
Hi buddy...!!!! ,,,what version of CST do you have...??? ,,,can you post the CST file..??
- Yesterday
-
Hi guys! I'm working on a spacecraft deployable antenna for the 300 - 400 MHz band. I found a good article on the subject of vibrator antenna and simulated it. I have encountered two problems: 1. I was not able to get a better VSWR than is shown in the figure. Maybe someone can optimize it better than me? 2. My CST does not show the axial ratio. How to solve this problem? Thanks in advance! Design Optimization of an Inverted V-dipole.pdf Dipole 351 antenna ver 3.cst
- Load more activity
.jpg.3d4982d183558d35ecf223ee3d0bb6e8.thumb.jpg.8796160d065c082439994cd2915a9871.jpg)