Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

aurel

Members
  • Content count

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by aurel


  1. Isolation between ports,i don't get it , do you mean isolation between director and central metal rod/screw ?

    I recently build one and work well, just is a sensitive to polarization.

    Jomy ..i have old satelite dish and i have in plan to use it to try pick up wifi signal ... air line cca 3- to 4 km i am not sure..

    so is it better use simple biquad with reflector and add it to satelite dish (60cm...or 70 i am not sure too) or ad patch similar to this 'gun' antenna 

    i mean just two reflector 90mm and patch 68mm...

    thanks !!


  2. Hi jomy

    somewhere is stated that this type of antenna is circular porized, that is not true at all, i recently have some problems with this antenna 

    my son use it on another computer complain to me that he have bad signal, he mean low signal from AP..

    after looking i think that something else is wrong ,AP send H polarized wifi signal and when we desolder and solder again coaxial cable inner wire into V

    position msignal becomes large and very very good , strenght more than 86%...So people be carefull how you polarize youer antennas!

    1 person likes this

  3. I must repeat my question :

    Do you have on your wifi card any program which show you signal strength?

    So it is very simple to test..in which case is better or larger signal ,with isolation from metal rod or without isolation.

    I can bet without  that better reception is with isolation between active plate and metal rod.

    please let me know do you can do that test! 


  4. Thank you jomy on simulation.

    Quote

     

     

    vars-cat

    forget about simulation ,every simulation show optimal or ideal values and don't represent real things.

    Do you have on your wifi card any program which show you signal strength?

    If you have such a program you will see a difference in signall strenght when active plate is connected to rod and when is not .

    There is no speculation about that and i know that from my experience.

    This antenna as such is asimetric half wave dipole  and as such require isolation between active element and radiator/reflector which must be grounded.

    1 person likes this

  5. Thank you jomy on simulation.

    Quote

     

    The tube is needed for reliability. 
    You don't need to isolate anything anywhere. 
    The cable braid must be in contact with the largest disk.

    Also:
    Instead of the RG-58 cable (high signal loss), it is better to use rg-6.
    The antenna made of copper cannot be used on the street.

     

    vars-cat I am really dissapointed in your explanation, active plate 68mm dia MUST BE ISOLATED from metal rod, big last metal plate is REFLECTOR  90mm

    which there is no need to be isolated from metal rod, finished copper plate can be spayed with metal primer to protect copper.