Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign In Sign Up

clanon

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    817

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by clanon

  7. Posted

    On 29/1/2025 at 8:36 PM, Harry36 said:

    This is all well and good, but what does this have to do with me? Did I say that's not true? The option that was originally posted by the Admin in the topic is not a circularly polarized antenna.  Without phase-shifting elements in this design it is impossible to obtain circular polarization. This is clear to me. in the initial version it is a regular mimo dipole. Perhaps the admin used a phase shift on the port when modeling. I have nothing to do with this.

    i wasn't blaming anyone , just asking for YOUR opinion...¬¬

  20. Posted · Edited by clanon

    different solver and different settings would give different F resonance . BUT dielectrics play the BIGGEST ROLE...try higher dielectric constant  WHAT THICKNESSES ? METAL moves fr UP

    ussually is 0.035 mm copper 1.53mm FR4

    1 person likes this