Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign In Sign Up

clanon

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    775

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by clanon

  1. Posted · Edited by clanon

    On 5/15/2025 at 11:03 AM, KSM said:

    Copper comes in different grades: M00, M0, M1, M2 and M3. The grade is determined by the purity of the copper content. M1p, M2p and M3p copper contain 0.01% oxygen and 0.04% phosphorus. Copper grades M1, M2 and M3 contain 0.05–0.08% oxygen.

    Brass might be better not so easy to oxidize...or protected from moisture PURE COPPER...(aluminum, zinc,etc)

    You'll have bigger losses on DIELECTRICS than metal every time

    1 person likes this

  3. Posted

    23 hours ago, devton said:

    20MHz width of channel for 5GHz - that is what can help to increase speed while connecting through building

    your choice of 40MHz width is good too...20 or 40 - one of this two will be best, other (wide) is not ok for this situation

     

    is WMM on\off making any difference?

    40mhz for SPEED (ideal conditions no loss of Packets or jumping signal strenghth) ,  20 for stability (bad conditions , reflections , etc on 2,4ghz tho 5.8ghz is a different beast)

  7. Posted · Edited by clanon

    what are the Huawei specs...model (that's HALF the network...) walls take at least 3db (depending in lots of factor Thickness materials metal is worse) the cpe has a lot of gain and needs a perfect alignment...but the router you are accesing needs to be free of metal obstacles on the LineOfSight...if possible otherwise you end up pointing to reflections and quality degrades a lot (passing vehicles cut MY connection sometimes Line of sight obstructed)

    1 person likes this

  16. Posted

    On 29/1/2025 at 8:36 PM, Harry36 said:

    This is all well and good, but what does this have to do with me? Did I say that's not true? The option that was originally posted by the Admin in the topic is not a circularly polarized antenna.  Without phase-shifting elements in this design it is impossible to obtain circular polarization. This is clear to me. in the initial version it is a regular mimo dipole. Perhaps the admin used a phase shift on the port when modeling. I have nothing to do with this.

    i wasn't blaming anyone , just asking for YOUR opinion...¬¬