Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Admin

Collinear antenna array

71 posts in this topic

@admin 

Do you have cst or stl file of the cilindrical metal collinear antenna ?

Many thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,for which antenna...??

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,this must be it...!!!

screenshot_429.png

screenshot_428.png

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Admin can you share some detailed connections of this or a step file as I am unable to understand the connections of center conductors with cylindrical pipes. Thanks.

colinear1.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's understandable, this...

screensh.png

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response. check the image

colinear2.JPG

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 6.3dBi for a 300mm of antenna 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's it, what are you going to do with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They are three dipole right? Gain is ok, but lenght could be less: first 93mm can be less!? Should not change gain

Screenshot_20250607_094701_Chrome.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really believe it, but I'll do a simulation in this regard...how much distance(93 mm) do you want ...???!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really I don't need, but I think balun can be some other thing like ferrite toroid on the feed cable after connector and 93.7 reduced to 60 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

60 mm not maybe>2*30,6+3=64,2 mm....!1!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/9/2020 at 3:46 PM, Admin said:

,,, and yet no, this omni antenna is not well sized...

screenshot_2357.jpg

,,, it is for 2.63 Ghz

and this is the reality after resizing...

screenshot_2358.jpg

I noticed the simulation includes a connector. Is it necessary to simulate with one?

Also, if the antenna ends with a copper rod, I have assigned the wave port by selecting the rod’s end face. Similarly, for a copper tube, I selected the tube’s face and assigned the wave port.

Kindly confirm if this method is correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Jayakumaran S said:

I noticed the simulation includes a connector. Is it necessary to simulate with one?

Also, if the antenna ends with a copper rod, I have assigned the wave port by selecting the rod’s end face. Similarly, for a copper tube, I selected the tube’s face and assigned the wave port.

Kindly confirm if this method is correct.

Face select inner+pet+shield+outer edge , then assign wave port (ALL of them should be leveled)

puting a PORT on the END of an ANTENNA is a NO-NO

Edited by clanon
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, clanon said:

Face select inner+pet+shield+outer edge , then assign wave port (ALL of them should be leveled)

puting a PORT on the END of an ANTENNA is a NO-NO

Thank you so much for the clarification and guidance sir. Your explanation really helped me understand the correct way to assign the wave port.

I truly appreciate your support and time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

I found an article about S band Collinear antenna. I tried to simulate it and it worked well. I'm sharing the article if you would like to try. All the dimensions are there, except via between top layer and bottom layer of PCB. I just use 1mm diameter via at feeding point. You may see photos below. The results I have in HFSS are similar to the results in article.

The only difference I made is PCB type. They use Neltec NY9220 (IM), I used Arlon DiClad880, both look similar. Rogers5880 also can be used but Arlon DiClad880 is more cheaper than Rogers5880. 
 

I've got the max gain at 2.6GHz which is 8.3 dBi. It's also 7.8 dBi at 2.4GHz. With some tuning the max gain can be at 2.4GHz but it's already have good performance.

For outdoor applications anyone who wants can also add a radome to this design.

HFSS Design photo1.pngHFSS Design photo2.pngHFSS Design photo3.png

HFSS Design photo4.png

HFSS Design photo5.png

Realized Gain 2600MHz.png

S11.png

Realized Gain.png

A Wideband Omnidirectional Printed Array Antenna.pdf

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never personally liked the dipole array on PCB...too much space and little gain...

But this is interesting due to the BANDWIDTH...(which is only 70-80 mhz needed for 2.4)

maybe an LTE adaptation could work...ALL METAL...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now