Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
clanon
Members-
Content count
891 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by clanon
-
it's a BALANCED antenna (symmetrical HALFs) it NEEDs a balun 1:1 if you're close to 50 ohms and 4:1 if you get close to 200ohms
-
W key and double click (align WCS) at the right point and angle. then make that distance the port length (a little more does not harm) SELECT port on the left panel and TRANSLATE (rotate) etc
-
it means that the FRECUENCY range choosed is too small , set it from 2 to 3 ghz the PEC thing doesn't matter much...is the MESH or check for INTERSECTIONS (interferences between solids)
-
nope , you need at least 6 patches and flaps...for that
-
which one the 8 patches (16db without flaps) or the 6 patches , you need...?
-
Lan23 guys tried that...(i did ) Fa20 Patches doesn't like DIRECTORS...reactivity and diagram goes "ape shit crazy" this is the best i could do...16 dbi on 6 or 8 patches (20 cm by 18) quarter FA20
-
Raytron 16dbi & 19dbi mod Hi , guys it would be nice if some generous soul simulate this one... The original is 6 elements over 0.787 ptfe , 2.1 dielectric constant... (Фольгированные материалы фирмы NELTEC (Франция) NELTEC — новое название фирмы METCLAD. Материалы предназначены для использования в качестве подложек в СВЧ-устройствах. Материалы имеют нормированную диэлектрическую постоянную, низкий уровень диэлектрических потерь и уменшенную толщину слоя меди. Основные параметры: Толщина диэлектрика: 0.127, 0.254, 0.508, 0.762, 0.787, 1.270, 1.524, 1.575, 3.175 мм Диэлектрическая проницаемость (на частоте 10 ГГц): 2.17 Panel_16dBi.pdf
-
13dbi HERE:https://martybugs.net/wireless/biquad/double.cgi (one of those and a HALF ,1.5 dBi more = 14.5dbi)
-
18 a 32 dbi...with a FLUX CAPACITOR and 1.21 GIGAWATTS! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc2D16xpziE&lc=UgwcKyseYpusW27DM0N4AaABAg
-
not sure about the ..."antenna"...but if you have an UNBALANCED (CO-AXIAL CABLE) contact on the board and you wanna extend that signal path... the coax shield is of the utmost importance (keeping isolation , impedance , and vswr) must be solder to gnd the closest possible to inner wire (50ohms) two antennas are for MIMO (speed)
-
REFLECTOR area ...must be IMPORTANT
-
all the info on parabolic dishes if you could get 70% efficiency you're GOLDEN
-
you might wanna look for BEST EFFICIENCY (low SPILLOVER , perfect ILLUMINATION) Blockage is important on small front feed dishes (the shade of the feed over the dish) the gain is of NO IMPORTANCE (on the feed) reflector is CLOSE BY... The SHAPE of the MAIN LOBE ( only one if possible) f-D ratio is your KEY NUMBER (0.2 to 0.5) lower f-D ratio = focus CLOSE to the rim- bigger f_D ratio focus FAR AWAY from f-D ratio yo'll know WHAT lobe of directivity would give you best ILLUMINATION (efficiency) THESE are the values for my dish 0.26 f-D ratio (meaning that the feed must provide 180 degrees of lobe at -6db) feed for 0,25 0.3 f_D ratios
-
but it would be really nice to see how it performs on the simulations... 24dbi for 64 dipoles is NOT that good...(lots of losses apparently)
-
more like 3.5dbi...
-
...blockage , 180 degrees at -6db illumination...efficiency...
-
-
Adjusted at 2.437ghz center CH 6 can't run the parabolic dish, too big...i dunno how the dish would change this results...(yet)
-
What's most important to me are the 180 degrees of illumination at about -6 db of gain... helix length – 13cm, 1.5mm wire ,5 doble turns instead of 4 on original site -6dB beamwidth of around 180 deg (good for f/D ratios 0.25 (focal plane dishes) to 0.3) -6dB in beamwidth corresponds to a -10dB edge illumination (max gain) since there is an additional -4dB spreading loss to the edge at these low f/D ratios.
-
always TWO PEAKS of resonance (1ghz- 2,5ghz ) NO S11 though... tubing should be better than flat plate... (i guess)
-
-
What it SHOULD look like WITHOUT the parasitic squares patches...
-
it looks like 5 ...but maybe 1 more really small close to the boom...
-
-
yep , is called optimization...but you could do it by hand if you know your stuff (right now i'm short on RAM and cores) so the closer y draw and scale the sooner i get to optimal...(but JOMY is the most experienced) if you could use 2d or 3d drawing ...it would be easier to share