Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

clanon

Dlink ANT24 1800

,, yes, I know it... long ago...!!!
,,, this antenna is very complicated to execute on the PCB and for so many patches, the gain is very small..!!!!
The patches should have a simpler geometry...!!!

,,, this variant in the air, is more interesting but with simpler patches...!!!

 

1800.JPG

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know , you hate DIELECTRICS!:D

 

 JOMY ,Thought , yo could give it a GO at the simulation , i get 18.8 dbi , low , very low EFFICIENCY

Edited by clanon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,Clanon, air antenna, other dimensions are required...!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YUP...EVERYTHING changes...changing substrates....have you worked with STYROFOAM ? (polystirene foam) if so...what constant and tangent loss should i use...some say 1.11 dielectric and some 0.003 loss...LOW DENSITY foam...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the dielectric constant = 1.2

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Captura.JPG

Efficiency is low...i blame the FR4 ... so far...(not sure though)

Edited by clanon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,, clanon, you, can post its technical drawing...???

I am most interested in the transmission lines .. !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont' undestand this part ...; 

9mm desde reflector to cara de cobre PCB

6 mm entre reflector y placa cobre no cara de cobre.

 

must be 6mm to square...?

DSCN4051.jpg

Edited by clanon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,, okay, if you put in place of rectangular patches, elliptical patches, like, what do you say ... ???

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

notice 8 internal patchs at HIGHER frecuency than 8 external patchs...two paks of resonance...it seems..

PS: the SCREWS are very IMPORTANT! there 

Edited by clanon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now