Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Edel2020

Members
  • Content count

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Edel2020


  1. Ok sorry if I'm clumsy searching, but this forum is huge and I've been searching for hours, I see that you offered to optimize this model and if I wanted to, I haven't seen other models this simple and powerful, yes I have seen others but with very complex balance lines Sorry again if I got into a very old topic, can you help me?


  2. Hello greetings to all ... continued with the subject to not let it cool I found this antenna produced only in the old GRANIA Germany in the 70s and 80s, great gain but very badly distributed throughout the bandwidth we use today (88-108) in those times and in that F / r.

     

    14.gif

    1 person likes this

  3. Friend, I have received stations with that antenna at a distance of 2200 km in New York and 2000 km in Houston Texas, but that happens 1 or 2 times a year at the most, when atmospheric conditions condition the propagation of radio waves, fundamental when DX is done in this band, (which seems to be what happened to our friend Sven) ... but it is not the common thing and less with this type of antenna and with those characteristics. The stations that I listen to the most daily are in that range of 200-250km and let me tell you that even with a signal amplifier and the antenna that I post at the beginning of the post (and which is more powerful than that) it is difficult for me to maintain stability in the signal.
    I opened this topic to see if something new emerged in the debate and other friends knew of other types of antennas with better characteristics and that were not so gigantic and complicated, something that with 3 meters in size achieves the maximum possible gain that can be squeezed ... .. if not possible there are no problems

    1 person likes this

  4. Greetings ... I already tried it and it is very good for its size but no, it is not that good, it does not have enough gain and the F / B is not that good either I have stations behind that bother a lot, I need at least 10 db in the whole band, or in large part at least to avoid having to use a signal amplifier, there are solutions, but they are huge monsters so I keep looking for something more ideal.
    I have reviewed http://www.ham-radio.com excellent site and there are very interesting things but who knows maybe there are better things out there, creative and intelligent people abound in this world.


  5. As for the material I will use whatever is necessary, according to the design, tubes of 9, 10, 11, 12 mm ..... square boom, round, whatever is necessary to squeeze the profit and the F / B, too it could be a quadix like this ... they say they are very good

    quadix.jpeg

    1 person likes this

  6. Let's see, sorry, it is not that they play with the data of the monster that I showed them, it is to optimize something smaller, as I said at the beginning (about 3m) ... I would like to squeeze something like that and then expose the measures to be able to build it and try it in real life .... thanks everyone for the answers

    CCIR antenna.gif

    1 person likes this