Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
aurel
Members-
Content count
132 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by aurel
-
Yes why...bad design probably... I don't understand this diagrams very well but i see f= 2.2 not 2.4ghz is that mean something?
-
Do you can simulate ...design i show in the image above? if is not problem ..i don't have that CST program.
-
I just cut the Cu wire but i use 2.5mm2 - ordinary electric cu wire which is wider so maybe i get better results..who knows. anyway antenna is easy to build...
-
Thanks So it is not 19 dB than maximum is 12 dB let say little bit less than double - biquad which is 14 ,,, i think ..right?
-
What you think about this shape?
-
Ok ... I think the same .... then if I am not wrong size of Cu wire from feed point is 210 mm...right ? so it is not wave x 2 _= 240 mm ?
-
,, Yes for that antenna... but something is strange about this shape , it looks that shape don't follow logic of self-similar progression and that is still L/4 or L/8 length ?
-
he he ..i see but what are the sizes of elements ? or i can just use standard 1/4 lambda ...like in biquad? if i catch some free time tomorrow i will try to build this one...
-
Hi Admin I have question about 4 zig-zag 2.4ghz antenna How is possible that such a simple design have such a high gain >>19db ? Please ..do you can show a measures of wiries for this antenna ? thanks Aurel
-
I have wifiSlax ...i think little bit newer version than this one and in general distribution is ok. But there are too many similar programs with lame results. Same or similar programs you may find in Xiaopan,Beini,tinyPaw which are really small distros . I don't know if better results we can get if we use Kali( ..backTrack) which is proclamated as THE BEST pentesting distro. And i really doubt about that..
-
Thanks ..so it is 46mm ..thanks For image B i am not sure because this is some sort of koch fractal shape but i see somewhere but like this:
-
Hi Admin My first question is about image A - is size of element 32mm? sorry i am not good with calculatioins.. second question is about classic biquad 1/4 just with minkowski shape on image B... i hope that is possible? thanks
-
Hello This design of double biquad i don't see yet anywhere? Is dimensions the same as classic D-biquad or last outer element is 3x4cm i mean triangle sizes? And also ..this forum is really great and i am glad that such a forum exists . So when i am here i must ask something. Is there a way to use minkowski fractal shape to build biquad ? I would like to try it ! thanks ..Aurel
