Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
-
Content count
132 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Calendar
Blogs
Downloads
Everything posted by aurel
-
I don't know ..i just follow the logic ..and most of fractal antennas are created like this. Are you sure that CST know calculate fractals ?
-
And yes it is lambda / 4
-
he he ... what is NOT TRUE... 15x20 ? yes it is 300....but maybe some other aspects are not true i don't know?
-
standard UHF chanels 21-69 freq 470 -860 Mhz well 15mm x 20 sides is 300mm
-
It is late here ..so i will trying tomorrow ... I already build one similar and give to my friend ..he says that work fine as indoor antenna.
-
ok then which sizes to use ?
-
In general ...can we use this dimensions (from colinear antenna) to build this one? 27mm, 6mm, 27mm, like is on picture?
-
Can we use this shape for 2.4ghz? I first time see such a design !!! with what dimensions?
-
Yes i know i will fix that...
-
Hi How to connect 4 zigZag elements i have crazy idea! Is there image of feed point conections for alredy made 4 zigzag with 4 elements ? thanks
-
ok they are here ,,quality is bad and those are just prototypes...he he one is yagi biquad and second is jensky when i change cable both work fine ...it looks that jensky work better because yagi reqiure more directivity
-
I think that i found what was the problem .... it was in wrong coaxial cable i was used tiny 4mm black coax rg..something which I replace with 7mm coax ko.ka 3000. length of cable is 5 m from antenna to wifi card and i get 43...47% of signal with Jensky (4 zigzag ) antenna without reflecor ! voila. With reflector i hope that signal would be over 50% ?
-
Thanks for simulation and dimensions.. I used for quick % dirty build measures for tringle 30-40-50 and distance from reflector 17mm and as i said signal strength is same like is with standard biquad. As i said ..i have problem with signal from AP which is 400 m from my house. I have optical match with AP antenna which is omni(fabric) and radiate in vertical polarization. So what would be the best option to build for this distance and vertical polarization? I already tried yagi-biquad and when i set in proper direction i dont get any signal? yes...is true BUT when i use extra reflector and turn yagi to this reflector then i get signal... so i catch reflected signal.... but direct i cannot get ? thanks
-
I replaced classic biquad with batwings element and i can confirm that work the same what means that signal strength is same . I also build biquad yagi with 5 directors(also biquads) and i will test it .
-
What i can expext if i replace classic biquad with wire with this one? I want improve signal strength ...distance is cca 500m from AP. I mean is it worth to try ...especially if you said that 75 ohm is ok ? thanks
-
Interesting shape.. What about this dimensions for 2.4 ghz...
-
I found this antenna on some radio amateur site YU ..i think and i don't get it why is connection point here where IS NOT maximum of current density?
-
then is there a way to build this one ...
-
I found this image ..about printed wire sierpinski fractal
-
ahhh it is attempt to create something useful In fact - we can create wire antenna adding nodes but is tooo slow.
-
then what is it ?
-
No i download it from sourceForge you can find it there...
-
Auuu that one was lame... I found on source forge program called VEMSA3D but i don't know how to work with it?
-
Is there any other freeware program which can replace CST maybe ? i mean for wire antennas?
