Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Search the Community: Showing results for tags 'biquad'.
Found 3 results
I am thinking of using bi-loop instead of biquad, I use matlab on a daily basis, and I have not yet managed to make a model, I am currently unable to check 1) Bi-Loop is mechanically simpler to make, tune and correction. What else, what profit can it give. In publication about this antenna for a 2,45GHz: "The simulation results showed that the best parameters value are 14.95 mm of loops radius, 1.15 mm of links radius, and 15.57 mm of reflector gap. In these parameters, the antenna had a characteristic value of return loss -36.65 dB, bandwidth 354 MHz" IMG_1496.webp
I'm new to this Forum and was wondering if anyone has any feedback regarding this antenna. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-novel-planar-four-quad-antenna-Ahmed-Menzel/88f3d0223574bc1929f25b52c35bc7f35b1b1b17 It interests me because it PCB, flat, dual polarized and a well defined elliptical pattern, which I need as part of an indoor location solution. I don't believe it's tuned for 2.45GHz. Could someone help me figure out what the final design would look like and specifications? Thanks