Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Hamza
Members-
Content count
232 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Hamza
-
Jomy. I m off ! The thickness of patch and director. You shared 0.5 mm and now. 1 mm ? Wich I follow?
-
There is not option of translate here hhhhh I m very interested of the topic
-
I understand it's clear 75 ohm thanks JOMY.
-
merci de vos efforts thanks for your efforts i will try it c'est tres gentil
-
I m looking for 1800 4g not for 2600 ! and for 75ohm I read on LAN 23 I had headache with false traduction and A Lot of negative critic ? So I m confused ! I need your help
-
I am looking for 1800 4g not 2600 and with 75 ohm. I read on LAN 23 but I had headache with the false traduction and A lot of negative critic
-
Yes I would like have this offset for 75 ohm it's possible mister jomy?
-
Long threated shaft. + Many screw hex ( diameter 10 mm)
-
It' works perfectly
-
Practical time
-
The improved helix antenna
-
Great Yes 16 DBI estimated ...
-
Yes 16 DBI estimated ...
-
Yes 107 degree is the best it took 1hours and half to finish it .thankfully I had already 2 disks 64.2 mm diameter. I got 57 % signal with double biquad and 83 % signal with this Julungaz antenna. It's worth to Make.
-
It's working wonderfully.
-
My hand made according to your friend julungaz
-
Sorry monsieur Jomy that's what I found on the site .
-
-
-
-
i think when the diameter 65.3 mm is better
-
great easy to make does it need balan ???
-
Thx jomy I ll try it
-
i agree CLANON But the 1/4 lambda guide is so different , WICH PROGRAM IS CORRECT
-
https://www.changpuak.ch/electronics/cantenna.php why i GOT big differentS resultS of 2 calculaters ( fr 1795 ,DIAMETER 110 MM) CHANGPUAK L = 0.75*LG = 122.16 / cantennator = 274.4 ( so long). CHANGPUAK LG/4 = 40.72 mm / cantennator = 91.5 mm ( distance bottom to probe)! any way for DIYER changpuak calculater is suitable becuz cantennator needs very long can (274 mm) but wich programm is right ???