Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

clanon
Members-
Content count
844 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by clanon
-
-
thinking about 15dbi or more by adding a reflector...Sectorial...
-
-
On 11/22/2024 at 3:10 AM, Pupe said:I tried to simulate the antenna in cst, but for some reason the resonance turned out to be shifted, all the dimensions were repeated exactly.
DIELECTRICS usually , radome adhesives...All add up in this case sustracts...
1 person likes this -
-
-
The shape of the main LOBE IIRC at -6 db affects efficiency...
1 person likes this -
-
-
-
Looks like you have a resonance , DEEP, at 2.8... try making the whole Yagi 1.16 times bigger...
-
1 person likes this -
-
-
Should I try with FR4 double sided PCB ?...(it must work but HIGHER LOSSES...maybe z would change...tho) Tomorrow i confirm it...
-
DXF , easier...TWO and a bridge in the back...+ CST (2019)
The one on the picture has a LOW FRECUENCY enhancement (200mhz) and a REFLECTOR PLATE some 10 cm in the back
1 person likes this -
-
0.1 Brass sheet (can use ANYTHING you have)
1 person likes this -
-
-
10 hours ago, ALecNET3993 said:This is slightly off topic but could you link me to some resources or books thought which i could learn how you guys are able to come up with the dimensions for this type of disc yagi antennas? Is it just trial and error or do you use any equations?
https://www.vinoth.org/rf-calculators/circular-patch-antenna-calculator
trial and error but several curves for director reflectors are well known ...NEED to run several SIMULATIONS , tho
2 people like this -
put the Feed lines close to reflector (2mm or less) and patches where they are and REACTIVITY and VSWR should get BETTER ! jomi
-
-
2 hours ago, AmateurRadist said:After 10 failed attempts I think deviding was not good idea, so friends just use antenna as it is, hope above information will be useful to someone thanks
The final impedance resonance vswr s11 , have the WHOLE as target...imho
-
in Antennas for 2.4 GHz band
Posted
Different SOLVERS give Different Center Frequency (Frequency vs Time Solvers)