Welcome to WIFI Antennas
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.
clanon
Members-
Content count
891 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by clanon
-
TAMP125 NO IDEA...but nestiam might open the box and SHOW US... the receiver has a lot of netbook antennas inside (no good)
-
-
Ant 1 and 2 are for frequencies from 600 700 and 960 Mhz also Ant3 and 4 are for frequencies ABOVE 1710Mhz Check YOUR frequencies of interest
-
What efficiency...? better or worse than FR4 ...did you input the Tangent loss...
-
What DIELECTRIC...?
-
different video same antenna
-
NEEDS refining...yet videopad.exe
-
-
...find one working HERE or anywhere and SCALE DOWN-UP to 3.5ghz that's the easiest way...(You'll NEED the CST or 3d model)
-
-
when looking for Interference between solids , watch closely if you want to TRIM the first one (metal overlapping dielectric) or INSERT the Dielectric into the METAL that overlaps... TRIM or INSERT are the most useful commands before simulation...
-
Jomy maybe YOU can post an animation (GIF) of the ENERGY flowing through the driven Disk surface...(to see it turn...)
-
the cable position is a NO-NO...imho
-
the materials maybe... Material: galvanized iron + powder enamel. (easy to copy and test...)
-
-
https://www.lte-anbieter.info/lte-hardware/antenne-bauen/bastelanleitung.php
-
Brass might be better not so easy to oxidize...or protected from moisture PURE COPPER...(aluminum, zinc,etc) You'll have bigger losses on DIELECTRICS than metal every time
-
-
40mhz for SPEED (ideal conditions no loss of Packets or jumping signal strenghth) , 20 for stability (bad conditions , reflections , etc on 2,4ghz tho 5.8ghz is a different beast)
-
-
-
PS: the cPE210 with a better antenna could have worked better than the 5ghz one...imho 15 dbi at least and Free LineOfSight...
-
what are the Huawei specs...model (that's HALF the network...) walls take at least 3db (depending in lots of factor Thickness materials metal is worse) the cpe has a lot of gain and needs a perfect alignment...but the router you are accesing needs to be free of metal obstacles on the LineOfSight...if possible otherwise you end up pointing to reflections and quality degrades a lot (passing vehicles cut MY connection sometimes Line of sight obstructed)
-
Transformed from dwg , 9mm to reflector , 1.5mm FR4. ant24-1800.cst
-