Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

clanon

Members
  • Content count

    678
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by clanon

  1. OLD and gone sites...from the beginnings of wifi era...(still relevant though) I have the xls if somebody needs'em...and links... PS: Jomy have you done one of this...?
  2. Did you notice ANY difference between that and a quarter wave MONOPOLE...?
  3. JOMY , i've tried making the inner wire longer...didn't work (i'm pretty sure mi solver settings and/or port are to blame) Sooner or later i'm gonna get the hang of it...
  4. Here's the cst...could'n make it work... ZIGZAG.cst
  5. "the 16 slotter gives slightly higher gain than my Hyperlink Technologies model 2419G Mesh Parabolic, which is "rated" at 19.1dBi gain."
  6. Jomy , could it be that i'm right with all sizes...BUT the SMA is not on 50ohms (after taking a bite of it) is a tricky shape close to the FEED Line... i'm gonna take some more copper out of it and see what happens with the IMPEDANCE (so close to 50ohms) 49.13...
  7. Here is the MODEL if you wanna give it a GO... (Didn't work for me) 6 patchs.cst
  8. Z shows arround 49ohms going up with frecuency...(the secondary lobe and misalignment of MAIN lobe ...i'll say is the feeding line to LONG...or the distance between patches too big...don't know (patches size seems RIGHT now...i think) " total efficiency must be <-0.06 dBi" yup ... is taking about 70% of power ...NOT ENOUGH for a 100mw card...(should be close to 90%) PS: I'm using Frecuency solver (it takes a while to solve) and WAVEGUIDE PORT inside the SMA and close to patchs plane... QUESTION...Can i SCALE parts of the whole thing , separately...? without dissasembling all pieces...(going back to boolean add)
  9. What do you think...? Jomy... i'm close...? vswr and s11 ...still off (a little) PD: Check what i did to your SMA to make it work...
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282776048_Crossed_Dipole_Antennas_A_review
  11. mostly ALL parameters CHANGE when you add a reflector...Z (Real and Reactive), Fr , Gain , etc...(imho) Bat wing antenna "Batwing antennas generate a horizontally polarized signal. " "The "batwing" shape of the elements is used because it gives the antenna a widebandwidth of approximately 20% of operating frequency at a VSWR of 1.1:1"
  12. It's been used from more than a 100 YEARS... But then again the most used antenna is like a quarter wave + balun or half wave alltogether https://martybugs.net/wireless/images/ducky_inside.jpg
  13. ...we're EVERYWHERE ...it seems... Aurel do you have DIMENSIONS for that antenna...? 64 mm each wire...i think
  14. https://ypylypenko.livejournal.com/59306.html
  15. Dimensions...? anybody... it wold be nice to adpt it to 2.4ghz...imho
  16. Ceragon REMEC ODU...not shure of "original" frecuency...It's from a Radio Link unit...all i know
  17. i know...my setting for the solver and or mi discrete port location must be REALLY OFF... (closer to 0 db...i know)
  18. I wonder if there is a simillar FOOTPRINT SIZE patch with 16dbi or more... Plannar no space for big reflector wings (Haven't found it yet)
  19. some little thing is OFF...causing that small side lobe on the right...but the earth ground shape is TOO IMPORTANT to vswr and gain...apparently
  20. YUP...it's like they're "Forcing" the wave to make a 90 DEGREES through the FEEDING LINE...IMHO...(it must be important) I'll keep you informed if i have success...to 15 or 16dbis...