Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

papagayor

Members
  • Content count

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by papagayor

  1. Or is better to go on this?
  2. For this construction and calculating dimensions for 2.44Ghz biquad, should the 2 sma's be isolated mount on reflector?
  3. Have a look at this: https://www.printables.com/model/886120-lte-4g-biquad-antenna-806mhz/files
  4. Two ports for a TP-Link MR-100 router outdoor antenna, it has 2 sma antennas, and I want to replace them for better signal gain, as the router cannot fitted outside, because need protection from rain. I made a biquad in antenna-magus, exported to CST, and then doubled the elements making also a larger reflector.
  5. Dual Port Biquad, correct and suggestions please Biquad.cst
  6. I think it is better 3300-3800-OPT.cst
  7. Modified the antenna but I'm getting errors, by your free time have a look and correct it please 3300-3800-1 MHz BESTER.cst
  8. You mean to attach a yagi-disk as director into a cantenna but using probes for signal as in cantenna? Or just put the whole construction in cantenna box for better performance? Cannot understand this plan.
  9. I'm not sure about tubes height, I'll try to lower tubes at a distance of 1/4λ as this is the proposed distance I have seen online samples
  10. Finished, how does it looks? Need more information?
  11. You'll make me go on buying a new laptop as these calculations are very heavy. I own a Lenovo L490 with 8365U, running Debian and Virtualbox running Win10 which then run CST!!!
  12. Have seen, trying but all these numbers look UFO to me
  13. Trying to learn
  14. The file you send me before is not correct and need to be modified in red line points as follow: 1. At these points the tubes are soldered on Reflector. 2. Tubes have the same length with the other 2 opposite tubes. 3. Under these 2 tubes, 2 SMA or N-type ports will be soldered. So I send you back the .cst file, I changed the dipoles size, but cannot modify tubes length and holes so that tubes electrically connected on reflector. If you have some time modify it and maybe new drawing be better, or mod it for 3.5GHz, it's very easy to be constructed. 3.52-1ghz.cst
  15. Good morning, forgot to ask something, what if tube is a bit different like 6 or 8mm instead of 7, because 7 is a difficult dia and cannot find it easily
  16. PERFECT, I'm going on construction
  17. Some explains please sir, all elements tube and disks can be copper made, and should be touch each other (electrically connected)? Also does the thickness of disks matter, thinking about using 0,5mm copper???
  18. ???
  19. THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!! Now please can I add a second port in 45 degrees phase to existing one, or need mods?
  20. Also I made a dual biquad, based on online calculations, and even I cannot test it for performance, my speedtests increased very much, i was taking -test in the morning when no much clients in ISP antenna- 30-50 Mbps and now it go up to 60-80 and some times over 150. I can't understand too much about measures, but looking in router results I took the attached measures, the SINR is not always the same it goes up-down to 1-10/ DBQuad.pdf
  21. Or like this one
  22. Thank you very much sir, but please can't my drawings be modified to work in this area? Because they're easy to be made for my skills. Also a dual polarized batwing with two ports would interesting.
  23. Then I have no luck, only by continue seeking online for some plans
  24. Calculations are not my best, so asking ChatGPT and DeepSeek for help by giving some dimensions and ask them to calculate frequency, or opposite, until I find a simple but good solution
  25. Without simulating the antenna is difficult for me, because as I've seen by seeking online, when an element size change the whole antenna elements must be change, because not only elements size is critical but also distance and position on reflector is critical too. I liked the Kathrein antennas procedure as they are very simple, and trying to make something similar by 4 copper sheet dipoles soldered on copper tubes and then solder tubes on reflector. Also I saw somewhere a Kathrein dipole antenna, that was like an upside down Π, that was a simple idea but cannot make the calculations. All I need is to make and mount a 3300-3800MHz antenna on a parabolic dish