Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Admin

Double Triunghiular Antenna

(DTA) is one of the best zig-zag antenna. Her canvas in contrast to the previously discussed antenna differs in that instead of two rhombuses consists of two triangular frames.

The antenna pattern in the horizontal plane with no reflector is an eight

The input impedance of the antenna in the receive frequency range depends on the antenna dimensions and its forms, from the placement of terminals to which is connected a coaxial cable or other transmission train, and also the location in close proximity to antennas of different construction which influence the distribution of electromagnetic field in space. In this case, the antenna is in good agreement with the coaxial cable is 75-Ohm characteristic impedance without other adaptation

This antenna is made by "com666" user.

 

89.jpg

 

double triangle_01.jpg

14376157.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,good, and here we have the simulation results of these antenna...

double triangle_01.jpg

double triangle_02.jpg

double triangle_03.jpg

double triangle_04.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 I think this butterfly shape is better...

15.jpg

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,, a new achievement of comm66 user...

15548374.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,we look forward to the size of this antenna, from com666-user...!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting shape..

What about this dimensions for 2.4 ghz...

batwing.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What i can expext if i replace classic biquad with wire with this one?

I want improve  signal strength ...distance is cca 500m from AP.

I mean is it worth to try ...especially if you said that 75 ohm is ok ?

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I replaced classic biquad with batwings element and i can confirm that work the same 

what means that signal strength is same .

I also build biquad yagi with 5 directors(also biquads) and i will test it .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,batwing can not compare to biquad...!!!

,,,this is the simulation for your antenna...

17.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,, these are the most optimal dimensions ....!!!

25.jpg

 

222.jpg

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for simulation and dimensions..

I used for quick % dirty build measures for tringle 30-40-50 and distance from reflector 17mm

and as i said signal strength is same like is with standard biquad.

As i said ..i have problem with signal from AP which is 400 m from my house.

I have optical match with AP antenna which is omni(fabric) and radiate in vertical polarization.

So what would be the best option to build for this distance and vertical polarization?

I already tried yagi-biquad and when i set in proper direction i dont get any signal? yes...is true 

BUT when i use extra reflector  and  turn yagi to  this reflector then i get signal...

so i catch reflected signal.... but direct i cannot get ?

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that i found what was the problem ....

it was in wrong coaxial cable i was used tiny 4mm black coax rg..something which I

replace with 7mm coax ko.ka 3000.

length of cable is 5 m from antenna to wifi card and i get 43...47% of signal with Jensky (4 zigzag ) antenna without reflecor !

voila. With reflector i hope that signal would be over 50% ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it could ... show some pictures of what you did ... !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok they are here ,,quality is bad 

and  those are just prototypes...he he

one is yagi biquad and second is jensky

when i change cable both work fine ...it looks that jensky work better 

because yagi reqiure more directivity

biquadYagi.gif

jensky.gif

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i know 

i will fix that...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0