Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sl4va

No name antenna 27+ dbi

56 posts in this topic
2 hours ago, Mishka said:

 

Does CST, or HFSS, or FEKO, or anything else besides the cocoaNEC support a programming language, or maybe have a built-in gradient descent or something like that to do the job?

CST is GUI intuitive...fast and efficient...

(no need for code or commands)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, clanon said:

CST is GUI intuitive...fast and efficient...

(no need for code or commands)

Although the NEC itself is pretty old piece of software, the cocoaNEC has its C-alike programming language so it's possible to calculate parameter values using a custom optimization algorithm. This is especially useful when there is no strong antenna theory behind the model and there are a lot of parameters to tweak so a simple sweep won't work well. As another example, someone could mention fractal antennas where the antenna itself can be generated.

Therefore I'm expecting the CST (or any other modern toolkit) can automatically perform many parameters adjustment in order to minimize VSWR, return loss, etc. Can it?

P.S. I'm on a Mac, and it seems any modern antenna software requires Windows nowadays. I'll be happy to know if the CST can run gradient descent or something similar over a set of parameters, or if it has a scripting interface.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Admin said:

,,, okay, it's enough to just give the dimensions...!!!

I can easily do it for a wire wound antenna. Is this what you meant?

Or I could model a non-MIMO LPDA similar to the KNA-27. The optimized model will give starting values for dimensions to play with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep , is called optimization...but you could do it by hand if you know your stuff (right now i'm short on RAM and cores) so the closer y draw  and scale the sooner i get to optimal...(but JOMY is the most experienced) if you could use 2d or 3d drawing ...it would be easier to share

Edited by clanon
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, the KNA-27 is built of six dipoles, not five as I counted initially!

But there's more! When I entered its parameters - 1700-2700 MHz bandwidth, 5 dipoles - into my NEC script, it resulted in a model where the third dipole is clearly missing. Interesting.

lpda-kna.png

Of course, the model is optimized (Smith chart inside the spoiler):

Spoiler

lpda-kna-smith.png

I'll re-run for 6 dipoles now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,, dimensions, please ... !!!
,,, or, I may need to install the NEC program again...!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Admin said:

,,, dimensions, please ... !!!
,,, or, I may need to install the NEC program again...!!!

No need to bother, please just wait for a while - the SGD is not fast because it's running on top of interpreted language. I'm calculating now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks like 5 ...but maybe 1 more really small close to the boom...

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Admin said:

,,, dimensions, please ... !!!
,,, or, I may need to install the NEC program again...!!!

Here we go. LPDA 1700-2700 MHz, it's made of 2.5 sq.mm copper wire and has 6 dipoles in total. All dimension in mm. Antenna is [loosely] matched to 50 Ohm, but looking at the Smith chart it seem behaves closer to a dipole. Antenna fed with a symmetrical source.

Of course, a tin-plated version will have different dimensions. As I mentioned earlier, to simulate it there's must be function for a wire mesh. Not too complicated to write though, but I'll be happy if you guys could do it in the CST.

KNA27-dim.png

Simulation data:

Spoiler

Smith chart:

KNA27-smith.png

VSWR:

KNA27-vswr.png

Return loss:

KNA27-RL.png

Azimuth (horizontal - solid, vertical - dashed):

KNA27-azimuth.png

Elevation (horizonal - solid, vertical - dashed):

KNA27-elevation.png

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mishka said:

Here we go. LPDA 1700-2700 MHz, it's made of 2.5 sq.mm copper wire and has 6 dipoles in total.

 

OOPS!

On the antenna drawing the distance between wires in the boom is 2.6 * 2 = 5.2 mm!

The NEC model is symmetrical, so 2.6 is the distance from the axis (zero) to each wire.

KNA27-dim.png

Edited by Mishka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Admin said:

OOPS,,, this antenna does not work...

screenshot_2265.jpg

Please hold on, an LPDA works by shifting phase across the boom. Every dipole must be fed with phase rotated 180º so it should look like this:

KNA27-wires.png

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Admin said:

,,,to see this...

 

Very interesting video. The impedance stub is a nice finish.

But I had difficulties to read cursor values on the network analyzer screen. It seem about to measure antenna return loss, but it's around 50dBm and changes insignificantly - the chart is 0.5dB/.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

always TWO PEAKS of resonance (1ghz-  2,5ghz )

NO S11 though...

tubing should be better than flat plate... (i guess)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For curiosity I've built the cocoaNEC generated dual-band LPDA. Well, the good news is that the VSWR and return loss are close to what was predicted by the NEC. Please note, the antenna was calculated for 2.4GHz and 5GHz WiFi ranges only and should not be expected to work outside of the bands. Also, my VNA can't see above 4.4GHz so unortunately I was unable to test it at 5 to 6 GHz range.

On the other side, antenna is out of impedance (which is sort of okay for LPDA). This may happen due to improper connection or other assembly issues. Such, for simpler assembly I've soldered a PCB edge SMA connector to the boom - this way the connector will fix the boom distance, but it appears to introduce phase shift between ground and the feed point. Also, the antenna assumes balanced input and this may also put it out of impedance. I'm thinking about adding the impedance matching stub like it was done by Andrew McNeil in the video above. Any thoughts on how to bring it to 50Ω will be highly appreciated.

 EpZbVDBWMAAw3UD?format=jpg&name=small

Measurements:

Spoiler

EpZbmO_XMAEGcBp?format=jpg

lpda-smith.png

Edited by Mishka
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,interesting...!!!

,,, can you give the dimensions ... ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Admin said:

,,,interesting...!!!

,,, can you give the dimensions ... ??

Sure!

lpda-db-dims.pnglpda-db-view.png

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,thanks,I"ll make a cst-simulation...!!!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Admin said:

,,,thanks,I"ll make a cst-simulation...!!!

Thank you! That would be very cool indeed! I still haven't found a Windows computer for that :-(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,, and here is the situation with this log-per...

screenshot_2438.jpg

I think there is still work to be done on this antenna ... !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Admin said:

,,, and here is the situation with this log-per...

I think there is still work to be done on this antenna ... !!!

Wow! Nice!

Please note, in the NEC model it's fed by a balanced source, and for my assembly I've rotated the SMA connector by 90 degrees (unbalanced feeding).

Well, as for ultra-wide band (2.4 - 7GHz) it looks not too bad. It seems all LPDAs are sort of compromise between bandwidth and quality. At least the model and implementation proves the gain is at about 7dB. Assuming a nice and big reflector which may add up to 20dB, should we consider the Kroks KNA+27 antenna in the subject may virtually go up to +27dBi?

Edited by Mishka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now